Ichor’s preclinical formulation development services evaluate key causes of protein instability, providing a clear and practical readout to help determine which formulation variables are driving solubility, association, aggregation, or stress-related problems and which strategy is most likely to correct these issues.
Why Use DoE?
| Benefit | Value |
|---|---|
| Efficient Screening | Evaluate multiple variables and interactions simultaneously instead of changing one factor at a time. |
| Faster Decisions | Prioritize the formulation conditions most likely to improve stability before committing material to deeper optimization. |
| Mechanistic Insight | Use diagnostic excipients to distinguish charge, hydrophobicity, metals, unfolding, and nonspecific protein interactions. |
| Clear Ranking | Receive model-based outputs that rank the strongest formulation effects and guide the next experimental step. |
| Optimization Ready | Translate screening results into targeted excipient testing and final formulation optimization. |
Featured Capabilities
Broad pH Assessment
Our preclinical formulation development test pH 4.5 through 8.5 to identify conditions that improve solubility and reduce pH-dependent association.
Ionic Strength Screening
Evaluate sodium chloride from 0 to 500 mM for charge-driven protein association or aggregation.
Conformational Stabilization
Assess trehalose from 0% to 10% for marginal stability and stress-induced unfolding.
Hydrophobic Aggregation Testing
Use Tween 80 from 0% to 0.05% to probe hydrophobic patch-driven aggregation.
Metal-Driven Instability
Evaluate EDTA from 0 to 2 mM to identify metal-catalyzed aggregation pathways.
Protein Interaction Control
Assess arginine from 0 to 500 mM for nonspecific protein-protein interactions.
Featured Model: DoE Preclinical Formulation Development
The initial DoE formulation screen evaluates approximately 36 conditions across six diagnostic factors. Rather than producing a simple pass/fail result, the model shows how each factor influences the measured response and identifies important interactions. Trend plots, effect rankings, and response-surface visualizations provide a practical basis for selecting promising conditions and designing focused follow-up studies.


