Macrophage response 2

Traditional immunotoxicology focuses on lymphocyte subsets, but biomaterials require innate immunity assays. M1 vs. M2 macrophage polarization testing reveals biocompatibility and pro-healing potential: faster closure, reduced scarring, enhanced regeneration. 

Preclinical Testing at Three Wound Healing Phases

Inflammatory Phase Cytokine & Macrophage Panels

We offer quantitative standard inflammatory panel + M1 vs M2 polarization assays quantify pro-inflammatory and pro-healing responses with biomaterials. 

Proliferative Phase Scratch Wound & Cell Migration

Ichor runs optimized primary cell (fibroblast and endothelial cells) models with real-time Incucyte scratch assays in classic/inflamed wound models. 

Remodeling Phase MMP Activity & Tissue Remodeling

In addition classic in vitro wound healing readouts, we commonly perform MMP activity profiling plus molecular endpoints (collagen deposition, gene expression, histology) to evaluate ECM remodeling and scar resolution in long-term studies. 

M1 vs M2 macrophage markers 

Macrophage response 3

Ichor quantifies 10+ key cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12p70, IL-23, CCL17/TARC, CXCL10/IP-10, etc.) via bead array in pg/mL ranges, enabling precise M1 pro-inflammatory vs. M2 pro-healing macrophage polarization analysis under biomaterials in wound healing models. 

Explore how biomaterials shape macrophage behavior in wound healing with experts in the field.

De-risk your biomaterial pipeline with early biocompatibility and desirable immune response to achieve superior wound healing outcomes 

Frequently Asked Questions